The last batch of Fauci files was supposed to be posted on Twitter in January, but went AWOL, if not a memory hole. Perhaps because they reveal too brightly the face of Fauvism, a type of administrative dictatorship exemplified by Anthony Faucinearly four decades of ruling the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAI)?
Favism combines control over financial resources and information with a carefully cultivated cult of personality. Fauci’s power grab went unnoticed for so long because the stakes seemed low, just $400,000+ per year wages and power to dispose 6 billion dollars a year in research funding.
We have since learned that Fauci and his wife, who coincidentally was the chief bioethicist at the National Institutes of Health (NIH), have earned nearly $1.8 million in 2020 from their salaries, investment income and patent royalties. Their combined net worth was over $10 million then, and is probably much higher now. The interest on these savings, plus a $350,000 pension and ongoing royalty payments, will provide Fauci with a retirement income of $1 million a year.
Cult of personality Created by Fauci with progressive legacy media and social media censorship, was so powerful that his Public admiration of fans his wax even after publicly exposing his many lies, logical inconsistencies, and megalomaniac claims about “represent science“.
Most impressive, however, was the political power that Fauci could wield through his control of NIAID funding. Only a few bold, retired or privately funded scientists have dared to question even his harshest claims regarding COVID-19, because Fauci’s public criticism is likely to meant cuts in their funding, which is career suicide for most research scientists. Thus, Americans have long remained in the dark about important facts about COVID, such as infection death rates, the effectiveness of various treatments, and the safety and effectiveness of masks and vaccines.
The only other serious source of opposition were those who had the intellectual capacity to understand what was going on, but who were not indebted to Fausian’s funding. Fauci knew that the lockdown and masking policy he was promoting was unjustified, so he turned to other parts of the government to silence the message of those questioning the lockdown, including the authors. Great Barrington Declarationas well as economists and political analysts such as Phil Magnessassociated with AIER, the Independent Institute, and several other non-profit organizations. The Fauci files promised to reveal the extent of his strangulation campaign.
Now that Fauci has finally retired, it’s tempting to think that America’s tortuous struggle with Fauvism is over. Unfortunately, the administrative overreach that underpins Fauvism has long been a feature of America’s national government. The disease hit hard during the New Deal, President Franklin D. Roosevelt’s administration’s radical response to the Great Depression. The first hundred days, the launch of the New Deal, began 90 years ago this week.
AIER was created in the same 1933 to fight the New Deal, which included a series of costly reforms that could change the nation in the name of economic security. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), NIH, and NIAID were largely post-war creations, but they were all modeled after New Deal-era bureaucracies such as the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, and the National Recovery Administration.
In each case, Congress has delegated broad powers to the executive to achieve some general purpose(s). The executive branch then established an agency, commission, corporation, or department and empowered them to achieve its general purpose(s) through the introduction of rules that soon became law.
At first, the courts tried to resolve disputes arising under the administrative rules, and some of them were rejected. But James M. Landis (1899–1964), a New Deal ex-bureaucrat and dean of Harvard Law School, argued that it was perfectly normal for unelected administrators to make important decisions about the life, liberty, and property of Americans based on the rules that administrators created and established. judged themselves.
Any problems that arise from giving administrators this leeway can be solved, Landis wrote in his 1938 book. administrative processsimply by improving administrative procedures. This extensive delegation of power was entirely democratic because Congress and the President agreed on a law to create a bureaucracy, and also agreed on its further funding.
Legislators, as the apologists of the administrative state assumed, would no doubt shut down a fraudulent agency that, say, habitually violated laws against animal cruelty P neglect concerns about gain-of-function research. Apart from Fauci and other bureaucrats like those in Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), at some point realized that the US government had become too big to be properly controlled by Congress or 330 million people with their own pressing concerns. Administrators can expand or enrich themselves as they see fit, especially during a supposed “emergency”.
While federal agencies and their executives may receive from time to time slap on the wrist, there appear to be no real checks against arbitrary abuse of one’s power. Many Americans want to “drain the swamp” and must find a way to do so before the swamp drains the rest of their individual autonomy and bank accounts.